RIP Television for Geeks
Aug. 24th, 2006 08:11 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
...this pisses me off more than I can say. Sci-Fi might have been the home for a lot of made-for-television bad sci-fi/horror, but it stood for something. Imagine. Let's imagine a world where geeks and nerds have a channel to watch geeky and nerdy things. Let's imagine that there's a media parent out there willing to front the money to keep such a network going...
I should've seen this coming with the announcements about the ECW. NBC/Universal has shown very little imagination in everything they've done with the channel, save their original programming (because BSG FTW). They're retaining Sci-Fi's original shows *now*, but don't look for them to keep producing similar shows.
Ah, I am not a happy duck.
ETA: Hoax. Although that it is so believable is sad.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 03:17 pm (UTC)I also notice the Sci-Fi channel representative didn't exactly let that one slip at Comic-Con this year. And I wonder how much of SG-1's cancellation has to do with this.
UGH.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 03:21 pm (UTC)Imagination is dead.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 03:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 03:40 pm (UTC)http://www.tvsquad.com/2006/08/24/someone-has-it-in-for-the-sci-fi-channel/
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 03:40 pm (UTC)http://mboard.scifi.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=2079304&an=0&page=0&gonew=1#UNREAD
I *think* there's a chance that it's an elaborate joke, since from what I understand pretty much anyone can post a release to PRweb, but . . . eh, I'm withholding judgment on this one for now. That way if/when I have to flail, I have the energy stored up to flail right.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 03:42 pm (UTC)http://www.tvsquad.com/2006/08/24/someone-has-it-in-for-the-sci-fi-channel/
So, it does seem to all be a hoax. But how sad is it that it could be accepted for truth?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 05:51 pm (UTC)But yeah, it -is- sad that it's so believable.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 11:02 am (UTC)