Surprising discovery
Aug. 27th, 2012 03:50 pmWhen I post vids, I usually only offer streaming. I have occasionally posted a file link because someone requested it of me, but the streaming has always been the important part. This year after Vividcon,
anoel hounded me after my vid posts went up about when a file download link would be available, so I put one up for all three new vids.
I'm pretty invested in my viewing statistics and I was disappointed to find that the streaming Vimeo embeds weren't getting that many views. However, on a whim, I checked my Apache logs and found that the download numbers for all three vids were far above and beyond what the streaming view statistics were (sometimes by a factor of 10).
So, I ask you, Internet -- do you prefer downloading your vids? Why? Should I go back and provide downloads for all of my vids?
I'm pretty invested in my viewing statistics and I was disappointed to find that the streaming Vimeo embeds weren't getting that many views. However, on a whim, I checked my Apache logs and found that the download numbers for all three vids were far above and beyond what the streaming view statistics were (sometimes by a factor of 10).
So, I ask you, Internet -- do you prefer downloading your vids? Why? Should I go back and provide downloads for all of my vids?
no subject
Date: 2012-08-27 11:06 pm (UTC)But totally put up download links. I like to download and save my faves forever and ever.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-27 11:26 pm (UTC)I am pondering whether it's worth putting all of my vids on YouTube. Right now they're on blip, and that's what I'm using for embeds on dw/lj and the AO3. I think I used to have the notion that YouTube wasn't as "safe" a place for fanvidders -- that we were likely to get our vids TOS'd or silenced. But now it seems as though more and more people are opting for YouTube channels for their vids. What made you opt for Vimeo?
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-27 11:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-28 12:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-28 12:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-28 12:44 am (UTC)Should I get a YouTube channel? I've always been terrified of getting TOS'd.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-28 04:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-28 04:59 pm (UTC)It's up to you, though!
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-28 07:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-29 03:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-27 10:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-27 11:38 pm (UTC)while it's a giant pain in the butt to make the vid, export the vid. upload the vid. stream the vid. write the vid post, having more options, IMO is good, because everyone has their own preferences/system limitations, etc, that would force them to download or stream.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-28 12:09 am (UTC)Frankly, if there is only a streaming version and no dl. I won't even bother to watch the vid unless I am really motivated (and if I am I'll probably try to find a way to capture it).
Why? I don't like to wait for buffering (occasionally in the middle of the vid), I prefer to control the aspect ratio and frame rate and screen size (if there are problems) in VLC, and I much prefer my own organization system for later viewing, rather than bookmarks.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-28 12:20 am (UTC)I do streaming because it seems to be expected and standard, but I like downloads better.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-28 12:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-28 02:43 am (UTC)Often times, I find that the streaming version tends to lag on my computer too, which sucks... So I absolutely prefer download.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-28 06:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-28 07:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-08-31 12:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
From: