Nate (
jetpack_monkey) wrote2005-09-05 12:42 am
This Old Meme...
Yeah, I probably did this not three months ago or somesuch, but hell, why not?
Total comments: 2667
These statistics were generated using LJ Stats. Original idea from
scrapdog's LJ Comment Stats Wizard.
| 1 | 961 | ||
| 2 | 315 | ||
| 3 | 141 | ||
| 4 | 103 | ||
| 5 | 87 | ||
| 6 | 61 | ||
| 7 | 57 | ||
| 8 | 50 | ||
| 9 | 45 | ||
| 10 | 41 | ||
| 11 | 40 | ||
| 12 | 39 | ||
| 13 | 36 | ||
| 14 | 34 | ||
| 15 | 33 | ||
| 16 | 32 | ||
| 17 | 31 | ||
| 18 | 30 | ||
| 19 | 30 | ||
| 20 | 29 | ||
| 21 | 26 | ||
| 22 | 24 | ||
| 23 | 24 | ||
| 24 | 21 | ||
| 25 | 21 |
These statistics were generated using LJ Stats. Original idea from
no subject
no subject
no subject
Booster17 (sneaking up another place)
no subject
And yeah *sneek-sneek!*
no subject
no subject
no subject
Y'know?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Speaking of, lots and lots of commenting would be swell. There's certain names of folks who I don't talk to anymore who I wouldn't mind seeing bumped off. So go to.
no subject
I just deleted them from mine. ;)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Perhaps that's why there's such a pitiful amount of comments from me. Either that or I'm just really really lazy. I'm leaning towards the second option myself. *g*
no subject
no subject